Prediction Aided Tapering In rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with biOlogicals (PATIO): protocol for a randomized controlled trial

3Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are effective in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) but are expensive and increase the risk of infection. Therefore, in patients with a stable low level of disease activity or remission, tapering bDMARDs should be considered. Although tapering does not seem to affect long-term disease control, (short-lived) flares are frequent during the tapering process. We have previously developed and externally validated a dynamic flare prediction model for use as a decision aid during stepwise tapering of bDMARDs to reduce the risk of a flare during this process. Methods: In this investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label, randomized (1:1) controlled trial, we will assess the effect of incorporating flare risk predictions into a bDMARD tapering strategy. One hundred sixty RA patients treated with a bDMARD with stable low disease activity will be recruited. In the control group, the bDMARD will be tapered according to “disease activity guided dose optimization” (DGDO). In the intervention group, the bDMARD will be tapered according to a strategy that combines DGDO with the dynamic flare prediction model, where the next bDMARD tapering step is not taken in case of a high risk of flare. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to the control or intervention group. The primary outcome is the number of flares per patient (DAS28-CRP increase > 1.2, or DAS28-CRP increase > 0.6 with a current DAS28-CRP ≥ 2.9) during the 18-month follow-up period. Secondary outcomes include the number of patients with a major flare (flare duration ≥ 12 weeks), bDMARD dose reduction, adverse events, disease activity (DAS28-CRP) and patient-reported outcomes such as quality of life and functional disability. Health Care Utilization and Work Productivity will also be assessed. Discussion: This will be the first clinical trial to evaluate the benefit of applying a dynamic flare prediction model as a decision aid during bDMARD tapering. Reducing the risk of flaring during tapering may enhance the safety and (cost)effectiveness of bDMARD treatment. Furthermore, this study pioneers the field of implementing predictive algorithms in clinical practice. Trial registration: Dutch Trial Register number NL9798, registered 18 October 2021, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/9798. The study has received ethical review board approval (number NL74537.041.20).

References Powered by Scopus

A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation

41186Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence

1255Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Validation of the 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) and European League Against Rheumatism response criteria based on C-reactive protein against disease progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and comparison with the DAS28 based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate

656Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

An AI-Powered Clinical Decision Support System to Predict Flares in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Pilot Study

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Tapering biologic DMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rheumatoid arthritis patients’ perspective on the use of prediction models in clinical decision-making

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Messelink, M. A., van der Leeuw, M. S., den Broeder, A. A., Tekstra, J., van der Goes, M. C., Heijstek, M. W., … Welsing, P. M. J. (2022). Prediction Aided Tapering In rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with biOlogicals (PATIO): protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06471-x

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

56%

Researcher 4

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 10

67%

Business, Management and Accounting 3

20%

Philosophy 1

7%

Computer Science 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0