Expression of idiotypic antibodies-1 and -2 and breastfeeding in relation to antibody levels against Haemophilus influenzae type b in children

4Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine the concentrations of serum antibodies against Haemophilus influenzae type b in preschool children in relation to the distribution of idiotypic antibodies 1 and 2 (Id-1 and Id-2) and the exposure to breastfeeding in infancy. Sera were obtained from 74 control children recruited in an earlier case-control study before the introduction of general Hib vaccination. Duration of breastfeeding was monitored, and prevalence of noninvasive infections was registered. Concentrations of IgG1 and IgG2 anti-Hib, as well as of total Id-1 and Id-2, were determined in ELISA. The expression of Id-1 antibodies increased with age in contrast to the Id-2 antibodies that were found only in children up to 24 months of age. Expression of Id-1 antibodies was positively correlated with higher anti-Hib levels of both the IgG1 and IgG2 isotype. Children expressing Id-2 antibodies showed higher IgG2 anti-Hib concentrations than those who did not have Id-2 (P = 0.001). The concentrations of neither Id-1 nor Id-2 antibodies were related to the duration of breastfeeding. Duration of breastfeeding was related to increased anti-Hib IgG2 in healthy children above 18 months of age. These study shows that the expression of idiotype-1 and idiotype-2 antibodies was associated with higher IgG2 anti-Hib concentration and that breastfeeding could enhance the anti-Hib IgG2 production in children. © 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Silfverdal, S. A., Bodin, L., Ulanova, M., Hahn-Zoric, M., Hanson, L. Å., & Olcén, P. (2006). Expression of idiotypic antibodies-1 and -2 and breastfeeding in relation to antibody levels against Haemophilus influenzae type b in children. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, 63(5), 371–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3083.2006.01746.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free