The ankle and foot

2Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The ankle and foot are mostly superficial structures and thus are particularly suitable for ultrasound evaluation. Direct patient contact allows accurate identification of the site of symptoms and allows a pertinent history to be obtained. Ultrasound also offers real-time comparison with the contralateral side. In addition, the dynamic nature of ultrasound may allow visualization of intermittent pathology, such as tendon subluxation and impingement. The internal vascularity of pathology - e.g., synovitis - can be assessed with Doppler without resorting to intravenous contrast injection. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) also has many inherent advantages including the imaging of deeper soft tissue structures, bones, and joints, and it is less operator dependent. MRI and ultrasonography are, however, complementary imaging techniques and the choice of modality will often depend upon local expertise, accessibility, and cost. © 2008 Springer-Verlag New York.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

O’Neill, J., & Glickman, A. (2008). The ankle and foot. In Musculoskeletal Ultrasound: Anatomy and Technique (pp. 243–280). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76610-2_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free