Workforce safety in the remote health sector of Australia: A scoping review

4Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives To scope the evidence surrounding workplace health and safety risks for the remote health workforce in Australia and to collate the recommendations to address those risks. Design A five-stage scoping review framework refined by Cooper et al was used for this review. Informit Health Collection, Ovid Emcare, Medline, Web of Science Core Collection, ProQuest and the grey literature were searched in October 2020 using a combination of key words derived from the eligibility criteria. No date restriction was placed on the search. Title and abstract screening, full-text review and data extraction were performed by three reviewers. Data were analysed by the lead author using qualitative thematic analysis. Eligibility criteria Articles were eligible for inclusion if they were published research or industry reports, focused on safety for the remote health workforce in Australia, identified hazards/safety risks or recommendations to reduce risk, and were written in English. Results The search yielded 312 articles, of which 18 met the inclusion criteria. A wide range of hazards/safety risks and recommendations were identified within the literature, which related to safety culture, isolation, safe environment, and education and training. Some recommendations, such as the use of a risk management approach, good post-incident support, safer clinics and accommodation, and improved access to education and training, had been discussed in the literature for over a decade, with a high level of agreement regarding their importance. Two articles briefly evaluated the impact of some recommendations. Conclusion While many recommendations have been developed to improve the safety of the remote health workforce in Australia, there is little evidence of their implementation and evaluation. As many remote health professionals report ongoing or worsening workplace safety issues, there is an urgent need for the implementation and evaluation of the workforce safety strategies recommended in the literature and required by legislation.

References Powered by Scopus

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

53614Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach

6354Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Patterns of resident health workforce turnover and retention in remote communities of the Northern Territory of Australia, 2013-2015

99Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Remote area nurses' experiences of workplace safety in very remote primary health clinics: A qualitative study

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Models of clinical supervision of relevance to remote area nursing & primary health care: A scoping review

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Compassion Satisfaction and Compassion Fatigue: Experiences of Rehabilitation Healthcare Workers in Rural and Remote Locations in Australia

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wright, L. K., Jatrana, S., & Lindsay, D. (2021, August 27). Workforce safety in the remote health sector of Australia: A scoping review. BMJ Open. BMJ Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051345

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2507142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

60%

Researcher 4

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 8

57%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

21%

Psychology 2

14%

Computer Science 1

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 14

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0