Structural Systems Comparison of Simply Supported PSC Box Girder Bridge Equipped with Elastomeric Rubber Bearing and Lead Rubber Bearing

  • Kurniawan Santoso A
  • Sulistyo D
  • Awaludin A
  • et al.
0Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study compares the influence of elastomeric rubber bearing (ERB) as the regular bearing support and lead rubber bearing (LRB) as the seismic isolation device on the seismic performance of a seven-span simply supported prestressed concrete (PSC) box girder bridge, which was analyzed using nonlinear time history analysis (NLTHA) with the OpenSees software. The results showed that the maximum pier responses and damage were smaller in models with LRB than with ERB. The bridge model using ERB occurred the slightest damage at levels II, while the one using LRB was at levels I. In addition, the highest seismic performance level in the model with ERB was at the operational limit. Meanwhile, the seismic performance in the model with LRB was at the fully operational limit. Thus, LRB was a good preference for improving the seismic performance and mitigating the damage due to the seismic excitation with a slender pier.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kurniawan Santoso, A., Sulistyo, D., Awaludin, A., Fajar Setiawan, A., Satyarno, I., Purnomo, S., & Harry, I. (2022). Structural Systems Comparison of Simply Supported PSC Box Girder Bridge Equipped with Elastomeric Rubber Bearing and Lead Rubber Bearing. Civil Engineering Dimension, 24(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.9744/ced.24.1.19-30

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free