Women's proper place and student-centered pedagogy

8Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Student-centered pedagogy has been embraced by many feminist practitioners and educational theorists as an antidote to more "traditional" or "masculinist" forms of classroom relations, epistemological constructs, and theories of self. I will show that the margin-center schema, student-centered pedagogy's foundational metaphor, undermines feminist projects when applied to teacher-student relations. Although the margin-center schema has been a useful diagnostic tool in feminist theory, it operates prescriptively in student-centered pedagogy. Student-centered pedagogy designates teachers' "proper place" at the margins of classroom life, a place that echoes bygone visions of domestic femininity. This paper is simultaneously a critique of student-centered pedagogy and a recuperative project to dislodge the work of John Dewey from the teacher-centered/student-centered binary. © Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2007.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Santoro Gómez, D. (2008). Women’s proper place and student-centered pedagogy. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(5), 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-007-9048-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free