Editorial comment: Determining doctors' views on performance measurement and management of their clinical practice

  • Rees C
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Determining doctors' views on performance measurement and management of their clinical practice Introducing performance measurement and management of clinicians' practice may improve clinical productivity and quality of patient care; however the attitudes of doctors to such approaches are poorly defi ned. This was investigated through an anonymous qualitative postal questionnaire in a large district general hospital. A total of 93 from an invited cohort of 368 senior grade doctors participated. The results suggested that doctors understood the need to evaluate and manage their performance in medical practice, and address poor performance, but felt that current methods were inadequate. This principally related to poor validation and a lack of clinical ownership of data. The role of fi nancial incentivisation was unclear but value was attributed to local clinical leadership, professional autonomy, recognition, and peer-group comparisons. This suggests that clinicians support the use of data-based performance measurement and management; however how it is undertaken is key to successful clinical engagement.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rees, C. (2015). Editorial comment: Determining doctors’ views on performance measurement and management of their clinical practice. Future Healthcare Journal, 2(3), 171–172. https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.2-3-171

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free