The Digital Transformation Conundrum: Labels, Definitions, Phenomena, and Theories

38Citations
Citations of this article
129Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The forthcoming JAIS special issue on “Envisioning Digital Transformation” is predicated on the assumption that theoretical diversity would be a good thing for the IS field. But making sense of theoretical diversity requires either a common frame of reference or crystal clarity about concept definitions and the phenomena to which they point. In this editorial, we argue that the IS field still lacks the conceptual and empirical clarity needed to benefit from theoretical diversity about digital transformation. The digital transformation label has been applied to the evolution of technology, as well as to the evolution of organizations and society. It has been used to refer to change in entities or processes and to processes of change. It has been used to refer to particular technological artifacts and to particular kinds of data and processing power. This type of diversity risks obscuring the value of diverse theoretical formulations. Only through clear distinctions and precise labeling of older and new phenomena can the IS field fully benefit from new theories and theoretical elaborations about digital transformation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Markus, M. L., & Rowe, F. (2023). The Digital Transformation Conundrum: Labels, Definitions, Phenomena, and Theories. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 24(2), 328–335. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00809

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free