Neoadjuvant immune-checkpoint blockade in triple-negative breast cancer: Current evidence and literature-based meta-analysis of randomized trials

15Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Chemotherapy based on the sequential use of anthracyclines and taxanes has long represented the most efficacious approach in the management of early-stage, triple-negative breast cancer, whose aggressive behavior is widely renowned. This standard chemotherapy backbone was subsequently enriched by the use of carboplatin, based on its association with increased pathologic complete response and efficacy in the metastatic setting. Following the results from the IMpassion130 trial, the recent approval of the immunotherapic agent atezolizumab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for programmed-death ligand 1-positive, unresectable locally advanced, or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer increasingly fueled the flourishing of trials of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in the early setting. In this work, we review the most recent inherent literature in light of key methodological issues and provide a quantitative summary of the results from phase II–III randomized trials of immunotherapic agents combined with chemotherapy in the setting of interest. Hints regarding future directions are also discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marinelli, D., Mazzotta, M., Pizzuti, L., Krasniqi, E., Gamucci, T., Natoli, C., … Vici, P. (2020). Neoadjuvant immune-checkpoint blockade in triple-negative breast cancer: Current evidence and literature-based meta-analysis of randomized trials. Cancers, 12(9), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12092497

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free