The use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement vs surgical aortic valve replacement for the treatment of aortic stenosis

  • Thourani V
  • Jensen H
  • Tsai L
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Severe aortic stenosis (AS) is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality and is increasing in prevalence as the global population increases. Since AS primarily affects the elderly, many of these patients have comorbidities that make them poor candidates for the gold standard treatment for AS, surgical aortic valve replacement. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement has emerged as a novel technology for the management of AS in higher risk patients over the past decade. Randomized trials have established the safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement, and the medical community has rallied to identify the patients who are most suitable for this transformative treatment. This review focuses on outlining the key procedural differences, describing the unique challenges of both operations, and finally assessing and comparing outcomes both on a general level and in challenging patient subgroups.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thourani, V., Jensen, H., & Tsai, L. (2015). The use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement vs surgical aortic valve replacement for the treatment of aortic stenosis. Research Reports in Clinical Cardiology, 105. https://doi.org/10.2147/rrcc.s71379

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free