Use of public immunization services after initiation of a universal vaccine purchase program

3Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the reasons why North Carolina families continue to use public immunization services 2 years after implementation of a universal vaccine purchase program, a state program intended to eliminate financial barriers to immunization in private physicians' offices. Methods: In-person interviews were conducted in 11 local public health departments in North Carolina. Participants: Consecutive sample of 64 adults accompanying children aged 2 years or younger presenting for immunization services. Main Outcome Measures: (1) Reasons for seeking immunization at the health department and (2) history of immunization from private physicians. Results: Two thirds of children obtained immunizations at the health department because of cost, including two thirds of children enrolled in Medicaid. Only 33% of children received well-child care from a private physician; for more than half of this group, the parents cited cost as the reason for using the health department, even though their physician was participating in the state universal purchase program. Of the 8 parents who told their child's private physician that they could not afford immunizations, none was told that the vaccine administration fee would be waived. Conclusions: Even though North Carolina's universal vaccine purchase program had been in effect for more than 2 years, a substantial number of children still received care from a private physician but used the health department for immunizations because of cost. These results indicate a need to explore additional strategies to preserve children's 'medical homes'.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Clark, S. J., & Freed, G. L. (1998). Use of public immunization services after initiation of a universal vaccine purchase program. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 152(7), 642–645. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.152.7.642

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free