Peer selection in peer-to-peer networks with semantic topologies

56Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Peer-to-Peer systems have proven to be an effective way of sharing data. Modern protocols are able to efficiently route a message to a given peer. However, determining the destination peer in the first place is not always trivial. We propose a model in which peers advertise their expertise in the Peer-to-Peer network. The knowledge about the expertise of other peers forms a semantic topology. Based on the semantic similarity between the subject of a query and the expertise of other peers, a peer can select appropriate peers to forward queries to, instead of broadcasting the query or sending it to a random set of peers. To calculate our semantic similarity measure we make the simplifying assumption that the peers share the same ontology. We evaluate the model in a bibliographic scenario, where peers share bibliographic descriptions of publications among each other. In simulation experiments we show how expertise based peer selection improves the performance of a Peer-to-Peer system with respect to precision, recall and the number of messages. © IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2004.

References Powered by Scopus

10603Citations
17768Readers
Get full text

Development and Application of a Metric on Semantic Nets

1482Citations
396Readers
Get full text
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Software architecture knowledge management: Theory and practice

126Citations
155Readers
Get full text

Towards semantic social networks

78Citations
59Readers

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haase, P., Siebes, R., & Van Harmelen, F. (2004). Peer selection in peer-to-peer networks with semantic topologies. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 3226, 108–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30145-5_7

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘220481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

59%

Researcher 8

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

18%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 30

91%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

3%

Neuroscience 1

3%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0