Poverty alleviation with microfinance: Bangladesh evidence

13Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study provides evidence of the impact of membership of a microfinance institution (MFI) in Bangladesh on poverty alleviation. Using a quasi-experimental approach with a control group the members of which had never been members of a MFI, interviews with members of a prominent Bangladesh MFI were conducted in relation to their material possessions. In almost every aspect of material well-being, including income, ownership of assets, savings and food intake, members of the MFI are significantly better off than non-members when examined on a univariate basis. In multivariate tests, MFI membership is found to be associated with household income and, further, household wealth, measured in terms of savings, is associated with longer membership of a MFI.

References Powered by Scopus

The microfinance promise

1204Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The impact of group-based credit programs on poor households in Bangladesh: Does the gender of participants matter?

807Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rural Credit Programs and Women'S Empowerment in Bangladesh

718Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Pathways from women's group-based programs to nutrition change in South Asia: A conceptual framework and literature review

67Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Does microfinance alleviate poverty and inequality? Studying self-help groups in Bodoland, Assam

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Health Layering Of Self-Help Groups: Impacts On Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn And Child Health And Nutrition In Bihar, India

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Habib, M., & Jubb, C. (2015). Poverty alleviation with microfinance: Bangladesh evidence. In Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion and Well-Being (pp. 11–30). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-420-7_2

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

44%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

25%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

19%

Researcher 2

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 10

45%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8

36%

Business, Management and Accounting 3

14%

Computer Science 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free