Should We Routinely Close the Fascial Defect in Laparoscopic Ventral and Incisional Hernia Repair?

12Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Closure of the hernia defect during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) remains controversial. We aimed to analyze whether closing hernia defects impacts in postoperative morbidity and recurrence rates after LVHR. Materials and Methods: A consecutive series of patients undergoing LVHR from January 2014 to June 2017 with a minimum follow-up of 6 months were included. The sample was divided into two groups: DC, patients with fascial defect closure and NDC, patients without closure of the defect. Postoperative morbidity and recurrence rates were compared between both groups. Results: A total of 100 patients were included, 51 had their defects closed (DC) and the remaining 49 patients had their defects not closed (NDC). There were no significant differences between groups regarding gender, age, smoking, body mass index, or preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists. Defect area was similar in both groups (DC: 37 cm2 versus 42 cm2 NDC, P =.6). Patients with defect closure had significantly longer operating time (DC: 111 and NDC: 88 minutes, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sadava, E. E., Peña, M. E., & Schlottmann, F. (2019). Should We Routinely Close the Fascial Defect in Laparoscopic Ventral and Incisional Hernia Repair? Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques, 29(6), 856–859. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2019.0088

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free