Public opinions and use of various types of recreational infrastructure in boreal forest settings

22Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We have investigated public preferences for use intensity and visual quality of forest recreational infrastructure. Forest infrastructure covers five classes, along a continuum from unmarked paths to paved walkways. Altogether, 39 sites were categorized into the five classes and measured with automatic counters. A sample of 545 respondents living in southeastern and middle Norway were asked to rate 15 forest scenes and 35 preconceptions of recreational settings. The path scenarios were depicted as digitally calibrated photos that systematically displayed physical path feature in boreal, semi-natural settings. Survey participants showed a clearly greater preference for photos and preconceptions of forests settings containing minor elements of forest infrastructure; unmarked paths received the highest score and forest roads/walkways/bikeways the lowest. We identified a clear mismatch between public preferences for forest infrastructure and the intensity of use; the less appreciated infrastructure was the most used. Planning and management has to consider these different needs for recreational infrastructure, and we propose an area zoning system that meets the different segments of forest visitors.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Get full text

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gundersen, V., & Vistad, O. I. (2016). Public opinions and use of various types of recreational infrastructure in boreal forest settings. Forests, 7(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/f7060113

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2406121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

57%

Researcher 6

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7

41%

Environmental Science 5

29%

Social Sciences 3

18%

Psychology 2

12%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0