Evaluation of CRAFT as a Tool for Caries Risk Assessment in 3-to 6-year-old Children and its Validation against Alban’s Test: A Pilot Study

6Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: Dental caries is a multifactorial disease and a dynamic process that can be prevented and reversed during the early stage. Risk assessment is an important step in decision-making and treatment planning. There are no valid tools available for the Indian population. Caries risk assessment for treatment (CRAFT) is a chairside tool for caries risk assessment and management. Valid, reliable, economical, and chairside caries risk assessment tool is the need of the hour for general and pediatric dentists. Aim: To evaluate CRAFT as a tool for caries risk prediction among 3-years to 6-years-old children and to validate it against Alban test. Materials and methods: A pilot study was conducted, including forty 3-years to 6-years-old children. Salivary samples were collected and inoculated on B.C.G.-Dextrose Agar. Caries activity was assessed using Alban test. Their parents/guardians completed the CRAFT assessment in entirety. Results: The data were tabulated and subjected to suitable statistical analysis. High positive correlation between CRAFT scores and Alban’s test (Spearman’s Rho = 0.874) was found. Conclusion: CRAFT scores were highly correlated with Alban scores in 3-to 6-year-old children. CRAFT could be successfully employed as a reliable, economical, chairside, and clinically feasible risk assessment tool with further research on a larger sample size. Clinical significance: CRAFT can provide a framework for the clinician for preventive care and enhance patient–participation for CRA.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thakur, J. H., Subhadra, H. N., & Jawdekar, A. (2019). Evaluation of CRAFT as a Tool for Caries Risk Assessment in 3-to 6-year-old Children and its Validation against Alban’s Test: A Pilot Study. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 12(6), 538–542. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1698

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free