Comparison of segmental and global markers of dyssynchrony in predicting clinical response to cardiac resynchronization

53Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces inter- and intraventricular dyssynchrony and shortens total isovolumic time (t-IVT). We compared the extent to which the values of ventricular dyssynchrony and t-IVT predict clinical benefits of CRT. Methods and results: Ventricular dyssynchrony was assessed in 39 patients with heart failure before and 6 months after CRT. Segmental dyssynchrony was identified from time to onset and peak systolic velocity of wall motion. T-IVT (s/min) was derived as [60-(total ejection time+total filling time)]. The difference between ventricular pre-ejection periods (D-PEP) was calculated. Outcome measures were fall in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and increase in cardiac output (CO). Following CRT, NYHA class fell in 29/39 patients, CO increased (by 1.0 L/min, P < 0.001), and intraventricular delay (Intra-VD), interventricular delay (Inter-VD), t-IVT, and D-PEP shortened (by 25 ms, 72 ms, 6 s/min, and 38 ms, P < 0.01). NYHA class and CO were unchanged with CRT in 10/39, and Intra-VD, Inter-VD, t-IVT, and D-PEP lengthened (by 43 ms, 52 ms, 7 s/min, and 35 ms, P < 0.05). Though univariate predictors of CO increment with CRT were Intra-VD, Inter-VD, t-IVT, and D-PEP, only pre-CRT values of CO (P < 0.001), t-IVT (P < 0.001), and D-PEP (P = 0.025) were independent. Conclusion: Global, rather than segmental, measures of ventricular dyssynchrony are powerful, independent predictors of clinical response to CRT. © The European Society of Cardiology 2006. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Duncan, A. M., Lim, E., Clague, J., Gibson, D. G., & Henein, M. Y. (2006). Comparison of segmental and global markers of dyssynchrony in predicting clinical response to cardiac resynchronization. European Heart Journal, 27(20), 2426–2432. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehl179

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free