Embodiment in simulation theory and cultural science, with remarks on the coding-problem of neuroscience

2Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The chapter discusses the role of cultural sciences (Kulturwissenschaften) in bridging the still existing gap between neuroscience and psychoanalysis against the background of the rising interest in mirror mechanisms, mimetic functions, imitation, simulation, embodiment, language and metaphors as well as their proximity to figures that have long belonged to the traditional subjects of the humanities. Knowledge on human expressions within a cultural-historical timeframe may be adduced to bridge the gap between data from empirical research and the evolution of the brain based on speculative knowledge. Weigel concentrates on certain unsolved epistemological problems to be reconsidered in light of knowledge from cultural science. Drawing on Freud and Walter Benjamin, she examines the quantity-quality-problem and the coding problem in simulation theory with reference to theories of language, gesture and image in the humanities. An example completes the chapter’s presentation of the cultural production of ‘compassion’ in medieval times in relation to the concept of empathy in recent neuroscience.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Weigel, S. (2016). Embodiment in simulation theory and cultural science, with remarks on the coding-problem of neuroscience. In A Neuro-Psychoanalytical Dialogue for Bridging Freud and the Neurosciences (pp. 47–71). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17605-5_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free