Effect of maturation culture period of oocytes on the sex ratio of in vitro fertilized bovine embryos

35Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

It has been suggested that the maturational stage of oocytes at time of insemination influences the sex ratio of resulting embryos. However, there are very few reports concerning the relationship between the maturation culture period of oocytes and the sex ratio of resulting embryos. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of in vitro maturation culture period for bovine oocytes on the sex ratio of in vitro produced blastocysts using a novel technique of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP). Cumulus-oocyte complexes were collected from the ovaries of slaughtered cows, and then matured in vitro for various periods (16, 22, 28, and 34 h). After maturation culture for each period, the oocytes were inseminated with frozen-thawed spermatozoa, and then cultured in vitro. Blastocysts were harvested on Day 7 after insemination, and the sex of the embryos was examined using the LAMP method. The rates of oocytes matured to the metaphase II stage were significantly lower (P<0.05) in the 16-h maturation group than in the other groups. The proportion of blastocyst formation after insemination was significantly higher (P<0.05) in the 22-h maturation group than in the other groups. The proportion of male blastocysts increased with the increase in maturation culture period. The proportion of male blastocysts derived from oocytes matured for 34 h was significantly higher (P<0.05) than from oocytes matured for 16 and 22 h. These results indicate that the sex ratio of in vitro fertilized embryos is apparently influenced by the maturation culture period of the oocytes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Agung, B., Otoi, T., Wongsrikeao, P., Taniguchi, M., Shimizu, R., Watari, H., & Nagai, T. (2006). Effect of maturation culture period of oocytes on the sex ratio of in vitro fertilized bovine embryos. In Journal of Reproduction and Development (Vol. 52, pp. 123–127). https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.17055

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free