Magnitude and frequency: Challenges for the assessment of vulnerability to geomorphic hazards

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In natural hazard research, risk is defined as a function of (1) the probability of occurrence of a hazardous process, and (2) the assessment of the related extent of damage, defined by the value of elements at risk exposed and their physical vulnerability. Until now, various works have been undertaken to determine vulnerability values for objects exposed to geomorphic hazards such as mountain torrents. Yet, many studies only provide rough estimates for vulnerability values based on proxies for process intensities. However, the deduced vulnerability functions proposed in the literature show a wide range, in particular with respect to medium and high process magnitudes. In our study, we compare vulnerability functions for torrent processes derived from studies in test sites located in the Austrian Alps and in Taiwan. Based on this comparison we expose needs for future research in order to enhance mountain hazard risk management with a particular focus on the question of vulnerability on a catchment scale. © 2012 WIT Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fuchs, S., Keiler, M., & Tsao, T. C. (2012). Magnitude and frequency: Challenges for the assessment of vulnerability to geomorphic hazards. In WIT Transactions on Information and Communication Technologies (Vol. 44, pp. 191–202). https://doi.org/10.2495/RISK120171

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free