Sebastián (this issue) argues that data from dream research undermines a prominent version of the higher-order representation theory of consciousness. In this commentary, I argue that Sebastián’s attack falls short, for three main reasons. First, the data from dream studies is notoriously hard to interpret, leaving ample space for the higher-order theorist to contest Sebastián’s claims. Second, even accepting the dream data as given, there is still enough brain activity present in the dreaming brain to vindicate higher-order claims. And third, it is not clear that the higher-order theory must be committed to the anatomical claims exposing it to Sebastián’s critique.
CITATION STYLE
Weisberg, J. (2014). Sweet dreams are made of this? A HOT response to Sebastián. In Consciousness Inside and Out: Phenomenology, Neuroscience, and the Nature of Experience (pp. 433–443). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6001-1_30
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.