Quantifying the confidence in fMRI-based language lateralisation through laterality index deconstruction

7Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In epilepsy patients, language lateralisation is an important part of the presurgical diagnostic process. Using task-based fMRI, language lateralisation can be determined by visual inspection of activity patterns or by quantifying the difference in left- and right-hemisphere activity using variations of a basic formula [(L-R)/(L+R)]. However, the values of this laterality index (LI) depend on the choice of activity thresholds and regions of interest. The diagnostic utility of the LI also depends on how its continuous values are translated into categorical decisions about a patient's language lateralisation. Here, we analysed fMRI data from 712 epilepsy patients who performed a verbal fluency task. Each fMRI data set was evaluated by a trained human rater as depicting left-sided, right-sided, or bilateral lateralisation or as being inconclusive. We used data-driven methods to define the activity thresholds and regions of interest used for LI computation and to define a classification scheme that allowed us to translate the LI values into categorical decisions. By deconstructing the LI into measures of laterality (L-R) and strength (L+R), we also modelled the relationship between activation strength and conclusiveness of a data set. In a held-out data set, predictions reached 91% correct when using only conclusive data and 82% when inconclusive data were included. Although only trained on human evaluations of fMRIs, the approach generalised to the prediction of language Wada test results, allowing for significant above-chance accuracies. Compared against different existing methods of LI-computation, our approach improved the identification and exclusion of inconclusive cases and ensured that decisions for the remaining data could be made with consistently high accuracies. We discuss how this approach can support clinicians in assessing fMRI data on a single-case level, deciding whether lateralisation can be determined with sufficient certainty or whether additional information is needed.

References Powered by Scopus

Definition of drug resistant epilepsy: Consensus proposal by the ad hoc Task Force of the ILAE Commission on Therapeutic Strategies

3621Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Presurgical evaluation of epilepsy

1380Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Handedness and hemispheric language dominance in healthy humans

1216Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Laterality indices consensus initiative (LICI): A Delphi expert survey report on recommendations to record, assess, and report asymmetry in human behavioural and brain research

33Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cerebral Polymorphisms for Lateralisation: Modelling the Genetic and Phenotypic Architectures of Multiple Functional Modules

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effects of left and right medial temporal lobe resections on hemodynamic correlates of negative and neutral scene processing

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wegrzyn, M., Mertens, M., Bien, C. G., Woermann, F. G., & Labudda, K. (2019). Quantifying the confidence in fMRI-based language lateralisation through laterality index deconstruction. Frontiers in Neurology, 10(JUN). https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00655

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

53%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

27%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

13%

Researcher 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Neuroscience 5

36%

Psychology 5

36%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

14%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0