Foveal processing difficulty does not affect parafoveal preprocessing in young readers

16Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Recent evidence suggested that parafoveal preprocessing develops early during reading acquisition, that is, young readers profit from valid parafoveal information and exhibit a resultant preview benefit. For young readers, however, it is unknown whether the processing demands of the currently fixated word modulate the extent to which the upcoming word is parafoveally preprocessed - as it has been postulated (for adult readers) by the foveal load hypothesis. The present study used the novel incremental boundary technique to assess whether 4th and 6th Graders exhibit an effect of foveal load. Furthermore, we attempted to distinguish the foveal load effect from the spillover effect. These effects are hard to differentiate with respect to the expected pattern of results, but are conceptually different. The foveal load effect is supposed to reflect modulations of the extent of parafoveal preprocessing, whereas the spillover effect reflects the ongoing processing of the previous word whilst the reader's fixation is already on the next word. The findings revealed that the young readers did not exhibit an effect of foveal load, but a substantial spillover effect. The implications for previous studies with adult readers and for models of eye movement control in reading are discussed.

References Powered by Scopus

Toward a Model of Eye Movement Control in Reading

1042Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity

919Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Swift: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading

898Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Parallel semantic processing in reading revisited: effects of translation equivalents in bilingual readers

45Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Return-sweep saccades during reading in adults and children

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How does foveal processing difficulty affect parafoveal processing during reading?

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marx, C., Hawelka, S., Schuster, S., & Hutzler, F. (2017). Foveal processing difficulty does not affect parafoveal preprocessing in young readers. Scientific Reports, 7. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41602

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

68%

Researcher 3

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

11%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 10

67%

Neuroscience 3

20%

Computer Science 1

7%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free