Post-disaster infrastructure delivery for resilience

18Citations
Citations of this article
114Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

As climate change increases the frequency and intensity of disasters and associated infrastructure damage, Alternative Project Delivery Methods are well positioned to enable innovative contracting and partnering methods for designing and delivering adaptation solutions that are more time- and cost-effective. However, where conventional “build-back-as-before” post-disaster reconstruction occurs, communities remain vulnerable to future disasters of similar or greater magnitude. In this conceptual paper, we draw on a variety of literature and emergent practices to present how such alternative delivery methods of reconstruction projects can systematically integrate “buildback- better” and introduce more resilient infrastructure outcomes. Considering existing knowledge regarding infrastructure resilience, post-disaster reconstruction and project delivery methods, we consider the resilience regimes of rebound, robustness, graceful extensibility, and sustained adaptability to present the potential for alternative project delivery methods to improve the agility and flexibility of infrastructure against future climate-related and other hazards. We discuss the criticality of continued pursuit of stakeholder engagement to support further improvements to project delivery methods, enabling new opportunities for engaging with a broader set of stakeholders, and for stakeholders to contribute new knowledge and insights to the design process. We conclude the significant potential for such methods to enable resilient infrastructure outcomes, through prioritizing resilience alongside time and cost. We also present a visual schematic in the form of a framework for enabling post-disaster infrastructure delivery for resilience outcomes, across different scales and timeframes of reconstruction. The findings have immediate implications for agencies managing disaster recovery efforts, offering decision-support for improving the adaptive capacity of infrastructure, the services they deliver, and capacities of the communities that rely on them.

References Powered by Scopus

Climate change: Stationarity is dead: Whither water management?

3508Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness

3456Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas

2011Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Predictive resilience of interdependent water and transportation infrastructures: A sociotechnical approach

26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Adaptive or absent: A critical review of building system resilience in the leed rating system

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The “Build-Back-Better” concept for reconstruction of critical Infrastructure: A review

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chester, M. V., El Asmar, M., Hayes, S., & Desha, C. (2021). Post-disaster infrastructure delivery for resilience. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063458

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 25

56%

Lecturer / Post doc 10

22%

Researcher 7

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 17

40%

Social Sciences 12

29%

Environmental Science 7

17%

Business, Management and Accounting 6

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 10

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free