Effects of age and gender on three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography measurements: Development of normal ranges

24Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Faecal incontinence is a common and morbid disorder that is often related to anal sphincter dysfunction. High-frequency, three-dimensional (3-D) endoanal ultrasonography (EAUS) allows greater spatial resolution and longitudinal appreciation of the anal canal than conventional 2-D assessment. A robust normal range of values allowing for age and sex is required for subsequent disease comparison. Methods: A group of 30 healthy male (n=12) and female (n=18) volunteers (median age, 49 years; range, 31-63 years) underwent 3-D EAUS using a high-frequency 10-MHz transducer. A reconstructed data cube was interrogated to measure anal canal structures in 2-D at high, middle and low levels, and in 3-D for longitudinal measurements. Results: Men had a significantly longer 3-D external anal sphincter (EAS) and internal anal sphincter (IAS) than women, especially the anterior EAS (mean in men 2.5 cm, mean in women 1.6 cm, p<0.0001). There were no significant differences between the sexes for anal canal length or by 2-D scanning for the thickness of the EAS and IAS. No significant differences were observed between parous and nulliparous women. Age had no significant effect on 3-D length measurements, but 2-D EAUS measurements of the thickness of both the IAS and EAS increased with age significantly (mid canal, p=0.004). On these bases, normal ranges were generated. Conclusions: Sphincter measurements, enabled by 3-D reconstruction, vary with age and sex. A normal range incorporating these variations has been produced for future data comparison in disease states. © 2008 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Knowles, A. M., Knowles, C. H., Scott, S. M., & Lunniss, P. J. (2008). Effects of age and gender on three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography measurements: Development of normal ranges. Techniques in Coloproctology, 12(4), 323–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-008-0443-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free