The effects of 6-week-decoupled bi-pedal cycling on submaximal and high intensity performance in competitive cyclists and triathletes

5Citations
Citations of this article
95Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Aim of this work was to examine the effects of decoupled two-legged cycling on (1) submaximal and maximal oxygen uptake, (2) power output at 4 mmol L -1 blood lactate concentration, (3) mean and peak power output during high intensity cycling (30 s sprint) and (4) isometric and dynamic force production of the knee extensor and Xexor muscles. 18 highly trained male competitive male cyclists and triathletes (age 24 ± 3 years; body height 179 ± 11 cm; body mass 78 ± 8 kg; peak oxygen uptake 5,070 ± 680 mL min -1) were equally randomized to exercise on a stationary cycle equipped either with decoupled or with traditional crank system. The intervention involved 1 h training sessions, 5 times per week for 6 weeks at a heart rate corresponding to 70% of VO 2peak. VO 2 at 100, 140, 180, 220 and 260 and power output at 4 mmol L -1 blood lactate were determined during an incremental test. VO 2peak was recorded during a ramp protocol. Mean and peak power output were assessed during a 30 s cycle sprint. The maximal voluntary isometric strength of the quadriceps and biceps femoris muscles was obtained using a training machine equipped with a force sensor. No diVerences were observed between the groups for changes in any variable (P = 0.15-0.90; eVect size = 0.00-0.30). Our results demonstrate that a 6 week (30 sessions) training block using decoupled crank systems does not result in changes in any physiological or performance variables in highly trained competitive cyclists. © Springer-Verlag 2010.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sperlich, B., Zelle, S., Kleinöder, H., Lochmann, M., Zinner, C., Holmberg, H. C., & Mester, J. (2011). The effects of 6-week-decoupled bi-pedal cycling on submaximal and high intensity performance in competitive cyclists and triathletes. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 111(8), 1625–1630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-010-1785-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free