SUMMAC: Re-Visiting NLI-based Models for Inconsistency Detection in Summarization

219Citations
Citations of this article
91Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the summarization domain, a key requirement for summaries is to be factually consistent with the input document. Previous work has found that natural language inference (NLI) models do not perform competitively when applied to inconsistency detection. In this work, we revisit the use of NLI for inconsistency detection, finding that past work suffered from a mismatch in input granularity between NLI datasets (sentence-level), and inconsistency detection (document level). We provide a highly effective and light-weight method called SUMMACC ONV that enables NLI models to be successfully used for this task by segmenting documents into sentence units and aggregating scores between pairs of sentences. We furthermore introduce a new benchmark called SUMMAC (Summary Consistency) which consists of six large inconsistency detection datasets. On this dataset, SUMMACConv obtains state-of-the-art results with a balanced accuracy of 74.4%, a 5% improvement compared with prior work.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Laban, P., Schnabel, T., Bennett, P. N., & Hearst, M. A. (2022). SUMMAC: Re-Visiting NLI-based Models for Inconsistency Detection in Summarization. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 10, 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00453

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free