Why Professionalism Demands Abolition of Carceral Approaches to Patients’ Nonadherence Behaviors

2Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Some clinicians’ and organizations’ considerations of how a patient’s prior adherence to health recommendations should influence that patient’s candidacy for a current intervention express structural racism and carceral bias. When clinical judgment is influenced by racism and carceral logic, patients of color are at risk of having their health services delivered by clinicians in ways that are inappropriately interrogative, aggressive, or punitive. This commentary on a case suggests how an abolitionist approach can help clinicians orient themselves affectively to patients whose health behaviors express or have expressed nonadherence. This article argues that an abolitionist approach is key to facilitating clinicians’ understandings of root causes of many patients’ nonadherence behaviors and that an abolitionist approach is needed to express basic health professionalism and promote just, antiracist, patient-centered practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tran, N., Kouyate, A., & Hahn, M. U. (2022, March 1). Why Professionalism Demands Abolition of Carceral Approaches to Patients’ Nonadherence Behaviors. AMA Journal of Ethics. American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2022.181

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free