Automatic Detection of Answers to Research Questions from Medline Abstracts

9Citations
Citations of this article
72Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Given a set of abstracts retrieved from a search engine such as Pubmed, we aim to automatically identify the claim zone in each abstract and then select the best sentence(s) from that zone that can serve as an answer to a given query. The system can provide a fast access mechanism to the most informative sentence(s) in abstracts with respect to the given query.

References Powered by Scopus

Towards Answering Opinion Questions: Separating Facts from Opinions and Identifying the Polarity of Opinion Sentences

797Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information

759Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Summarizing scientific articles: Experiments with relevance and rhetorical status

496Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A corpus with multi-level annotations of patients, interventions and outcomes to support language processing for medical literature

127Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

EBM+: Advancing Evidence-Based Medicine via two level automatic identification of Populations, Interventions, Outcomes in medical literature

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Automated Contradiction Detection in Biomedical Literature

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alamri, A., & Stevenson, M. (2015). Automatic Detection of Answers to Research Questions from Medline Abstracts. In ACL-IJCNLP 2015 - BioNLP 2015: Workshop on Biomedical Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Workshop (pp. 141–146). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w15-3817

Readers over time

‘15‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 24

71%

Researcher 5

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

9%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 27

75%

Linguistics 5

14%

Social Sciences 2

6%

Engineering 2

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0