From constraints to resolution rules part I: Conceptual framework

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Many real world problems appear naturally as constraints satisfaction problems (CSP), for which very efficient algorithms are known. Most of these involve the combination of two techniques: some direct propagation of constraints between variables (with the goal of reducing their sets of possible values) and some kind of structured search (depth-first, breadth-first,⋯) . But when such blind search is not possible or not allowed or when one wants a "constructive" or a "pattern-based" solution, one must devise more complex propagation rules instead. In this case, one can introduce the notion of a candidate (a "still possible" value for a variable). Here, we give this intuitive notion a well defined logical status, from which we can define the concepts of a resolution rule and a resolution theory. In order to keep our analysis as concrete as possible, we illustrate each definition with the well known Sudoku example. Part I proposes a general conceptual framework based on first order logic; with the introduction of chains and braids, Part II will give much deeper results. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Berthier, D. (2010). From constraints to resolution rules part I: Conceptual framework. In Advanced Techniques in Computing Sciences and Software Engineering (pp. 165–170). Springer Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3660-5_28

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free