Efficacy and limitations of F-18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography to differentiate between malignant and benign bone and soft tissue tumors

3Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background/Aim: Positron emission tomography (PET) using 18fluorine-labelled fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), is the most widely applied molecular imaging technique in oncology. The present study assessed the efficacy and limitations of FDG-PET by comparing FDG accumulation in bone and soft tissue lesions, as well as histopathological features. Patients and Methods: The study included 122 patients with 165 lesions, as assessed by histopathological examinations. The maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) of benign lesions were compared to those of primary, recurrent, or metastatic sarcomas, as well as those of other malignancies. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of SUVmax for differentiation between benign lesions and primary sarcomas were 67.9%, 92.9%, and 80.4%, respectively. There were no significant differences between benign lesions and recurrent or metastatic sarcomas. Conclusion: Although FDG-PET is a useful imaging modality to differentiate primary sarcomas from benign lesions, it is difficult to differentiate residual or metastatic sarcomas from benign lesions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Miwa, S., Mochizuki, T., Yamamoto, N., Shirai, T., Hayashi, K., Takeuchi, A., … Tsuchiya, H. (2018). Efficacy and limitations of F-18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography to differentiate between malignant and benign bone and soft tissue tumors. Anticancer Research, 38(7), 4065–4072. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.12696

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free