Is a Shared Past Possible? The Ethics and Practice of Archaeology in the Twenty-First Century

  • Hodder I
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

I take it for granted that archaeological stewardship should be based on dialogue between stakeholdergroups. Some form of collaboration and consultation is at the heart of most attempts today to dealwith long-term stewardship issues, whether it is the consultancy involved in the development of theStonehenge management plan or the dialogues involving archaeologists, governments, and indigenouspeoples throughout the world (e.g., Swidler et al. 1997). I also take it for granted that many guidelines andprocedures have been discussed for such stewardship collaboration dealing with a wide range of issues,including the need to identify all potential stakeholders, provide time for consultation, evaluate varyingcultural values regarding heritage, and assess economic implications (e.g., de la Torre 1997)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hodder, I. (2011). Is a Shared Past Possible? The Ethics and Practice of Archaeology in the Twenty-First Century. In New Perspectives in Global Public Archaeology (pp. 19–28). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0341-8_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free