The relationship between culling rate, herd structure and production efficiency in a pig nucleus herd

8Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Computer simulation of sow culling was run in a nucleus herd. The specified constant culling rate from 15 to 21% was simulated for all parities. The resultant different age structure of a herd was studied from the aspect of piglet production and other production indicators. With increasing culling rate the percentage of mated gilts was increased in order to maintain the constant size of the sow herd. With 15% simulated culling, which required 17.09% of mated gilts, the percentage of sows at parity 1 and 2 and the percentage of sows at parities 3-5 were balanced (31.62% and 31.77%, respectively). Annual herd replacement was 37.62%. After five parities only a little more than a half (55.63%) of the total number of sows in the herd was removed. Similar results were obtained with 16% culling, which also made it possible to maintain the recommended herd structure. With higher culling rate parities 1 and 2 became dominant in the herd. With 21% culling and 19.84% of mated gilts the percentage of sows at parities 1 and 2 was 35.52% while it was only 29.90% at parities 3-5. Annual herd replacement amounted to 43.67%, and almost 70% of sows were removed after five parities in this case. With increasing culling rate the average age of sows removed from a herd decreased (1158.1-1 021.2 days), the number of barren days in a herd per year increased (6 174-6 680 days) and the number of piglets weaned per sow per year decreased (19.54-18.92 piglets). At the same time, there was a decrease in total costs (64 789-63 519 Kĉ), returns (79 816-77 327 Kĉ) and profit (15 026-13 808 Kĉ) in the herd, as recalculated per sow per year, and profitability also decreased.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Houška, L. (2009). The relationship between culling rate, herd structure and production efficiency in a pig nucleus herd. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 54(8), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.17221/1660-cjas

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free