Rearticulating the friend-enemy distinction within states: The HCNM's 'new diplomacy' of desecuritization

0Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article's premise is that the practice of representatives of international organizations has something important to tell us about what it means to 'do desecuritization'. The analysis provides a qualitative process-tracing of diplomacy by the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe's (OSCE's) High Commissioner on National Minorities (HCNM). It finds that 'new diplomats' can 'do desecuritization' differently. By rearticulating norms, as well as negotiating interests, the HCNM is able to escape the constraints imposed by security grammar and begin to transform the friend-enemy distinction within states. 'New diplomats' like the HCNM are capable of initiating such fundamental changes within states because their non-state platforms and institutional cultures transcend traditional international dichotomies of 'us' and 'them'. These findings add nuance to our understanding of desecuritization as practice and suggest a novel methodological approach for studying desecuritization empirically.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jackson-Preece, J. (2018). Rearticulating the friend-enemy distinction within states: The HCNM’s “new diplomacy” of desecuritization. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 13(4), 523–544. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-13030027

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free