The Diabetes Excess Weight Loss (DEWL) Trial: A randomised controlled trial of high-protein versus high-carbohydrate diets over 2 years in type 2 diabetes

123Citations
Citations of this article
262Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis To compare the effectiveness of low-fat high-protein and low-fat high-carbohydrate dietary advice on weight loss, using group-based interventions, among overweight people with type 2 diabetes. Study design Multicentre parallel (1:1) design, blinded randomised controlled trial. Methods Individuals with type 2 diabetes aged 30-75 years and a BMI >27 kg/m 2 were randomised, by an independent statistician using sequentially numbered sealed envelopes, to be prescribed either a low-fat high-protein (30% of energy as protein, 40% as carbohydrate, 30% as fat) or a low-fat highcarbohydrate (15% of energy as protein, 55%as carbohydrate, 30% as fat) diet. Participants attended 18 group sessions over 12 months. Primary outcomes were change in weight and waist circumference assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Secondary outcomes were body fatness, glycaemic control, lipid profile, blood pressure and renal function. A further assessment was undertaken 12 months after the intervention. Research assessors remained blinded to group allocation throughout. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed. Results A total of 419 participants were enrolled (mean±SD age 58±9.5 years,BMI 36.6±6.5 kg/m 2 and HbA 1c 8.1±1.2% (65 mmol/mol)). The study was completed by 70%(294/419). No differences between groups were found in change in weight or waist circumference during the intervention phase or the 12-month follow-up. Both groups had lost weight (2-3 kg, p<0.001) and reduced their waist circumference (2-3 cm, p<0.001) by 12 months and largely maintained this weight loss for the following 12 months. By 6 months, the difference in self-reported dietary protein between groups was small (1.1%total energy; p<0.001). No significant differences between groups were found in secondary outcomes: body fatness, HbA 1c, lipids, blood pressure and renal function. There were no important adverse effects. Conclusions/interpretation In a 'real-world' setting, prescription of an energy-reduced low-fat diet, with either increased protein or carbohydrate, results in similar modest losses in weight and waist circumference over 2 years. Trial registration: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Register ACTRN12606000490572 Funding: The Health Research Council of New Zealand (06/337). © 2012 Springer-Verlag.

References Powered by Scopus

Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Provisional report of a WHO consultation

11566Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (Sf-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs

5671Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The new England journal of medicine: Comparison of weight-loss diets with different compositions of fat, protein, and carbohydrates

1588Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Standards of medical care in diabetes-2014

0
3964Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Nutrition therapy recommendations for the management of adults with diabetes

598Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Lifestyle Weight-Loss Intervention Outcomes in Overweight and Obese Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

468Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Krebs, J. D., Elley, C. R., Parry-Strong, A., Lunt, H., Drury, P. L., Bell, D. A., … Mann, J. I. (2012). The Diabetes Excess Weight Loss (DEWL) Trial: A randomised controlled trial of high-protein versus high-carbohydrate diets over 2 years in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia, 55(4), 905–914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-012-2461-0

Readers over time

‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 86

62%

Researcher 24

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 15

11%

Professor / Associate Prof. 14

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 99

66%

Nursing and Health Professions 29

19%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13

9%

Social Sciences 10

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0