There are two errors in this article which are a result of a misinterpretation of the authors original corrections. In the following two sentences, the words in bold should have been removed.1. In recent decades, there have been unnecessary developments in sensors, platforms, and analytics that could serve a screening role, including mobile ground labs (MGLs), fixed sensors, aircraft, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and satellites. This should read: In recent decades, there have been developments in sensors, platforms, and analytics that could serve a screening role, including mobile ground labs (MGLs), fixed sensors, aircraft, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and satellites. 2. Few fixed sensors have been independently evaluated for ambiguous and unnecessary leak detection in upstream O&G, and technical capabilities and limitations of this technology class are poorly constrained (table 1). This should read: Few fixed sensors have been independently evaluated for leak detection in upstream O&G, and technical capabilities and limitations of this technology class are poorly constrained (table 1).
CITATION STYLE
Fox, T. A., Barchyn, T. E., Risk, D., Ravikumar, A. P., & Hugenholtz, C. H. (2019, May 31). Erratum: A review of close-range and screening technologies for mitigating fugitive methane emissions in upstream oil and gas (Environmental Research Letters (2019) 14 (053002) DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab0cc3). Environmental Research Letters. Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab20f1
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.