Spatial heterogeneity of malaria in Indian reserves of southwestern Amazonia, Brazil

15Citations
Citations of this article
68Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Malaria constitutes a major cause of morbidity in the Brazilian Amazon where an estimated 6 million people are considered at high risk of transmission. Indigenous peoples in the Amazon are particularly vulnerable to potentially epidemic disease such as malaria; notwithstanding, very little is known about the epidemiology of malaria in Indian reservations of the region. The aim of this paper is to present a spatial analysis of malaria cases over a four-year time period (2003-2006) among indigenous peoples of the Brazilian State of Rondônia, southwestern Amazon, by using passive morbidity data (results from Giemsa-stained thick blood smears) gathered from the National Malaria Epidemiologic Surveillance System databank. Results: Atotal of 4,160 cases of malaria were recorded in 14 Indian reserves in the State of Rondônia between 2003 and 2006. In six reservations no cases of malaria were reported in the period. Overall, P. vivax accounted for 76.18 of malaria cases reported in the indigenous population of Rondônia. The P. vivax/P. falciparum ratio for the period was 3.78. Two reserves accounted for over half of the cases reported for the total indigenous population in the period - Roosevelt and Pacaas Novas - with a total of 1,646 (39.57%) and 1,145 (27.52%) cases, respectively. Kernel mapping of malaria mean Annual Parasite Index - API according to indigenous reserves and environmental zones revealed a heterogeneous pattern of disease distribution, with one clear area of high risk of transmission comprising reservations of west Rondônia along the Guaporé-Madeira River basins, and another high risk area to the east, on the Roosevelt reserve. Conclusion: By means of kernel mapping, it was shown that malaria risk varies widely between Indian reserves and environmental zones defined on the basis of predominant ecologic characteristics and land use patterns observed in the southwestern Brazilian Amazon. The geographical approach in this paper helped to determine where the greatest needs lie for more intensively focused malaria control activities in Indian reserves in the region. It also provided a reference to assess the effectiveness of control measures that have been put in place by Brazilian public health authorities. © 2008 Souza-Santos et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

High prevalence of asymptomatic Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum infections in native Amazonian populations

247Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Malaria risk on the Amazon frontier

197Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Malaria vectors in the Brazilian Amazon: Anopheles of the subgenus Nyssorhynchus

178Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The First National Survey of Indigenous People's Health and Nutrition in Brazil: Rationale, methodology, and overview of results

177Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Does deforestation promote or inhibit malaria transmission in the Amazon? A systematic literature review and critical appraisal of current evidence

93Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prevalence of anemia and associated factors among indigenous children in Brazil: Results from the First National Survey of Indigenous People's Health and Nutrition

85Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Souza-Santos, R., de Oliveira, M. V. G., Escobar, A. L., Santos, R. V., & Coimbra, C. E. A. (2008). Spatial heterogeneity of malaria in Indian reserves of southwestern Amazonia, Brazil. International Journal of Health Geographics, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-7-55

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 35

67%

Researcher 8

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 10

32%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9

29%

Nursing and Health Professions 6

19%

Social Sciences 6

19%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free