A rate dependent experimental and numerical analysis of adhesive joints under different loading directions

9Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Adhesively bonded joints subjected to dynamic loading demand reliable and accurate measurement techniques to capture their rate dependent traction–separation behaviour. Particularly challenging is the measurement of damage and failure processes which are fundamental to develop the corresponding cohesive zone models. This paper proposes a new experimental methodology for the characterisation of rate-dependent behaviour of adhesive joints. The results of the adopted approach have been used to calibrate a rate-dependent numerical cohesive model proposed to simulate the failure of adhesive joints. The procedure was benchmarked against quasi-static DCB and ENF experiments.

References Powered by Scopus

An investigation of the mechanical properties of materials at very high rates of loading

2966Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A continuum model for void nucleation by inclusion debonding

1971Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The relation between crack growth resistance and fracture process parameters in elastic-plastic solids

1556Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Review of experimental techniques for impact property of adhesive bonds

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Experimental and numerical study of rate-dependent mode-I failure of a structural adhesive

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cohesive zone failure modeling of polymeric adhesives used in ceramic/metal armor

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lißner, M., Alabort, E., Erice, B., Cui, H., & Petrinic, N. (2018). A rate dependent experimental and numerical analysis of adhesive joints under different loading directions. European Physical Journal: Special Topics, 227(1–2), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2018-00070-x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

80%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

13%

Researcher 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 11

92%

Psychology 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free