The Human Embryo: Aristotle and the Arabic and European Traditions

  • Barton T
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Questions asked by Greek philosophy and science - how do we come to be? How do we grow? When are we recognizably human? - are addressed with new intensity today. Modern embryology has changed the methods of enquiry and given new knowledge. Public interest and concern are high because medical applications of new knowledge offer benefits and yet awaken ancestral fears. The law and politics are called upon to secure the benefits without realizing the fears. Philosophers and theologians are involved once again.In this volume some of the world's authorities on the subject trace the tradition of enquiry over two and a half thousand years. The answers given in related cultures - Greek, Latin, Jewish, Arabian, Islamic, Christian - reflected the purposes to be served at different times, in medical practice, penitential discipline, canon law, common law, human feeling. But the terms in which the questions were discussed were those set down by the Greeks and transmitted through the Arabic authors to medieval Europe.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barton, T. S. (1992). The Human Embryo: Aristotle and the Arabic and European Traditions. Journal of Medical Ethics, 18(1), 54.2-55. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.18.1.54-a

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free