Airway colonisation in long-term mechanically ventilated patients

  • Girou E
  • Buu-Hoi A
  • Stephan F
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

To evaluate the impact of continuous subglottic suctioning and semi-recumbent body position on bacterial colonisation of the lower respiratory tract. A randomised controlled trial. The ten-bed medical ICU of a French university hospital. Critically ill patients expected to require mechanical ventilation for more than 5 days. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either continuous suctioning of subglottic secretions and semi-recumbent body position or to receive standard care and supine position. Oropharyngeal and tracheal secretions were sampled daily and quantitatively cultured. All included patients were followed up from day 1 (intubation) to day 10, extubation or death. Ninety-seven samples of oropharynx and trachea were analysed (40 for the suctioning group and 57 for the control group). The median bacterial counts in trachea were 6.6 Log10 CFU/ml (interquartile range, IQR, 4.4–8.3) in patients who received continuous suctioning and 5.1 Log10 CFU/ml (IQR 3.6–5.5) in control patients. Most of the patients were colonised in the trachea after 1 day of mechanical ventilation (75% in the suctioning group, 80% in the control group). No significant difference was found in the daily bacterial counts in the oropharynx and in the trachea between the two groups of patients. Tracheal colonisation in long-term mechanically ventilated ICU patients was not modified by the use of continuous subglottic suctioning and semi-recumbent body position.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Girou, E., Buu-Hoi, A., Stephan, F., Novara, A., Gutmann, L., Safar, M., & Fagon, J.-Y. (2004). Airway colonisation in long-term mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Medicine, 30(2), 225–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-003-2077-4

Readers over time

‘15‘19‘22‘2300.511.52

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 3

75%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

25%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0