Using cell cycle analysis to estimate in situ growth rate of the dinoflagellate dinophysis acuminata: Drawbacks of the DNA quantification method

18Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In an attempt to use cell cycle analysis to estimate in situ gross growth rate of the dinoflagellate Dinophysis acuminata, epifluorescence microscopy in combination with an image analysis system was used to measure the relative DNA content of DAPI stained D. acuminata nuclei. To be able to estimate growth rate with this method, the time it takes for a cell to synthesise a second DNA copy and complete mitosis (the duration of the terminal event in the cell cycle) must be known or measurable. The duration of the terminal event is normally estimated graphically from diurnal variations in the phase fraction curves. No diurnal variation in the phase fractions was detected in this study, and consequently no reliable estimate of the duration of the terminal event could be obtained. The main draw, back was the difficulty in delineating the S phase in DNA histograms based on only a few hundred cells. No clear S phase maximum could be obtained during our 48 h study. The presence of doublenucleated cells and a constantly high percentage (23 to 43 %) of cells with double genomes (G2 + M phase cells) suggests, under the assumption that no cells can arrest in the G2 or M phase, that the population was actively dividing, but not clearly in phase with a diurnal cycle. Chang and Carpenter (1991) previously estimated the duration of the terminal event (the duration of the S + G2 + M phases) in this species to be 11 to 13 h. A 12 h duration of the terminal event in this study would yield specific growth rates of 0.69 to 0.75 d-1. We conclude that the number of cells that can be measured using epifluorescence microscopy (a few hundred per sample) is too low to allow detection of a low degree of synchronisation, especially with regard to the S phase. Estimations of in situ growth rate of poorly synchronised populations of phytoplankton using the cell cycle technique will require DNA measurements on several thousand cells per sample, e.g. using flow cytometry or automated image cytometry.

References Powered by Scopus

A review of harmful algal blooms and their apparent global increase

2155Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Identification of Dinophysis fortii as the Causative Organism of Diarrhetic Shellfish Poisoning

311Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The discovery of mixotrophy in photosynthesis species of Dinophysis (Dinophyceae): Light and electron microscopical observations of food vacuoles in Dinophysis acuminata, D.norvegica and two heterotrophic dinophysoid dinoflagellates

142Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Flow cytometry as a tool for the study of phytoplankton

92Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Temporary cyst formation in phytoplankton: A response to allelopathic competitors?

81Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Role of food uptake for photosynthesis, growth and survival of the mixotrophic dinoflagellate Dinophysis acuminata

73Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gisselson, L. Å., Granéli, E., & Carlsson, P. (1999). Using cell cycle analysis to estimate in situ growth rate of the dinoflagellate dinophysis acuminata: Drawbacks of the DNA quantification method. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 184, 55–62. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps184055

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 14

45%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

35%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

19%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22

67%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 7

21%

Environmental Science 3

9%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free