Anosmia and dysgeusia in COVID-19: A systematic review

75Citations
Citations of this article
233Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: This systematic review had three aims: i) to determine the frequency of anosmia (or other smell disorders) and dysgeusia (or other taste disorders) in COVID-19 patients; ii) to determine whether anosmia or dysgeusia are independently associated with COVID-19 diagnosis; and iii) to determine whether anosmia or dysgeusia are prognostic factors for impaired outcomes among COVID-19 patients. Methods: On April 20 th, 2020, we search MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health, Scopus, Web of Science and MedXriv. We used terms related to COVID-19, smell and taste disorders. We selected case series, cross-sectional, case-control and cohort studies. We included studies with COVID-19 patients describing their symptoms; studies that compared smell and taste disorders between COVID-19 patients and otherwise healthy subjects; and studies comparing smell and taste disorders between COVID-19 severe and mild/moderate cases. Because of methodological heterogeneity and the limited number of results, a qualitative synthesis is presented. Results: From 31 reports, we selected six (n=2,757). Six studies reported the proportion of smell and taste disorders among COVID-19 patients. Two reports studied whether smell and taste disorders were independently associated with COVID-19 diagnosis. No reports studied the association with impaired outcomes among COVID-19 patients. The frequency of anosmia ranged between 22%-68%. The definition of taste disorders varied greatly, with dysgeusia present in 33% and ageusia in 20%. People who reported loss of smell and taste had six-fold higher odds of being COVID-19 positive; similarly, anosmia and ageusia were associated with 10-fold higher odds of COVID-19 diagnosis. Conclusions: The frequency of smell and taste disorders is as high as other symptoms, thus, at least anosmia for which the definition was more consistent, could be included in lists of COVID-19 symptoms. Although there is promising evidence, it is premature to conclude that smell and taste disorders are strongly associated with COVID-19 diagnosis. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020181308

References Powered by Scopus

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

53614Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China

35225Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China

21544Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Quality of life and safety impact of COVID-19 associated smell and taste disturbances

64Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

SARS-CoV-2 and oral manifestation: An observational, human study

61Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Alterations of frontal-temporal gray matter volume associate with clinical measures of older adults with COVID-19

53Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carrillo-Larco, R. M., & Altez-Fernandez, C. (2020). Anosmia and dysgeusia in COVID-19: A systematic review. Wellcome Open Research. F1000 Research Ltd. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15917.1

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 55

63%

Researcher 18

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 10

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 82

73%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 11

10%

Nursing and Health Professions 10

9%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free