The Impact of Introducing a Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Consultation Service to an Academic Burn Center

3Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Prior retrospective studies suggest that physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) acute care consultation improves outcome and reduces acute care length of stay (ACLOS) in trauma patients. There have not been prospective studies to evaluate this impact in burn patients. This cohort study compared outcomes before and after the introduction of a PM&R consultation service to the acute burn program, and the inpatient rehabilitation program, at a large academic hospital. The primary outcome measures were length of stay (LOS) in acute care and during subsequent inpatient rehabilitation. For the acute care phase, there were 194 patients in the preconsultation group and 114 who received a consultation. There was no difference in age, Baux score, or LOS in these patients. For the rehabilitation phase, there were 109 patients in the prephysiatrist group and 104 who received PM&R care. The LOS was significantly shorter in the latter group (24 days vs 30 days, P =. 002). Functional independence measure (FIM) change, unexpected readmission, and discharge destination were not significantly different. The addition of a burn physiatrist did not influence ACLOS. However, there was a significant reduction in inpatient rehabilitation LOS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Robinson, L. R., Godleski, M., Rehou, S., & Jeschke, M. (2019). The Impact of Introducing a Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Consultation Service to an Academic Burn Center. Journal of Burn Care and Research, 40(5), 648–651. https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irz079

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free