Drainage Collection After Endoscopic-Assisted Transaxillary Dual-Plane Augmentation Mammaplasty Using Cold or Electrosurgical Separation of Interpectoral Space

10Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic transaxillary augmentation mammaplasty breast augmentation offers several advantages over other augmentation methods. Nonetheless, this procedure is fraught with some problems, including greater surgical trauma due to the longer separation area. We hypothesized that cold separation of the interpectoral space could reduce surgical injury in comparison to the electrosurgical method. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of endoscopic-assisted transaxillary augmentation mammaplasty using cold separation versus electrosurgical separation of the interpectoral space. Methods: In this prospective clinical trial, cold and electrosurgical separation of the interpectoral space were achieved using a separation shovel and monopolar electrotome, respectively. A total of 20 patients who visited our department in Beijing, China, for primary breast augmentation surgeries from October 1, 2017, and May 31, 2018, were included. The primary outcome was total postoperative drainage volume. The secondary outcomes were operative time, daily drainage volume, daily pain as assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS), and reoperation rate. Quantitative data were compared using independent-samples t test. Chi-square test was used to compare 2 classified indexes. Results: The total drainage volume was significantly lower in the cold separation group than in the electrosurgical separation group (170.45 ± 75.40 mL vs 281.05 ± 148.43 mL; P =.005). The VAS score on the first postoperative day was significantly lower in the cold separation group than in the electrosurgical separation group (6.45 ± 1.93 vs 7.55 ± 1.43; P =.048). Two (20%) reoperations owing to postoperative pain or implant stiffness were performed in the electrosurgical separation group. Conclusions: Cold separation is more conducive to reducing drainage, relieving postoperative pain, and causing less damage than the electrosurgical method in endoscopic-assisted transaxillary dual-plane augmentation mammaplasty.

References Powered by Scopus

The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain

3023Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity

909Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale

804Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

LncRNA LOC146880 Promotes Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Progression via miR-328-5p/FSCN1/MAPK axis

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparison Of Endoscopic Transaxillary And Peri-areolar Approaches In Breast Augmentation With Smooth Implants

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Shakespearean Dilemma in Breast Augmentation: to Use Drains or not? a Systematic Review: Drains in Breast Augmentation

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, Z., Mu, D., Xu, B., Wang, C., Cheng, H., Li, S., & Qi, J. (2020). Drainage Collection After Endoscopic-Assisted Transaxillary Dual-Plane Augmentation Mammaplasty Using Cold or Electrosurgical Separation of Interpectoral Space. Plastic Surgery, 28(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/2292550319880913

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2500.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 3

75%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0