Diagnosing asthma in adults in primary care: A qualitative study of Australian GPs' experiences

23Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: To explore what difficulties are faced by general practitioners (GPs) when trying to make a diagnosis of asthma in adults, and whether there are patient characteristics that influence this process. Methods: A qualitative study in which three focus group discussions were conducted with 18 GPs. Results: GPs were confident with the components needed to confirm a diagnosis of asthma but not with the use of spirometry. GPs said that time was an important factor - time to undertake the tests in their practice, and time to persuade the patient to engage in the diagnostic process including follow-up visits. Patients who were less willing to engage in this process were likely to be treated symptomatically. Conclusion: Continuity of care is important. A diagnosis of asthma seems to be more likely in patients with an ongoing relationship with their GP where both are willing to engage in the diagnostic process. © 2010 Primary Care Respiratory Society UK. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dennis, S. M., Zwar, N. A., & Marks, G. B. (2010). Diagnosing asthma in adults in primary care: A qualitative study of Australian GPs’ experiences. Primary Care Respiratory Journal, 19(1), 52–56. https://doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2009.00046

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free