Estudo preliminar da saúde oral de desportistas praticantes de boxe

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: To characterize the oral health status of boxing practitioners; to know the frequency of use of mouthguards and its effects on the oral health of boxing practitioners; to compare the use of mouthguards and its oral health effects between practitioners of maintenance and competition boxing. Methods: The target convenience population consisted of amateur boxing practitioners at a Boxing School in Lisbon. Data was collected through a questionnaire, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) palpation, and an oral cavity observation to evaluate the decayed, missing and filled teeth (DMFT) index, the gingival index (GI) and the simplified oral hygiene index (OHI-S). Data were analyzed with Cramer's V test (Α=0.05). Results: The sample consisted of 36 individuals, mostly male, aged between 18 and 65 years. Most participants used mouthguards (89%), and the "Boil and Bite" type was the most popular. Concerning the oral effects of practicing boxing, most were observed in the TMJ, as 33% of the practitioners had pain in that articulation and 25% had difficulty opening their mouth; this was confirmed during TMJ palpation, in which 64% of the participants presented clinical changes. Regarding oral hygiene habits, most participants indicated brushing 2 to 3 times a day, using interdental techniques and visiting the dentist 1 to 2 times a year. Data from oral screening revealed the following mean values: 5.66 for DMFT, 2.59 for OHI-S and 0.59 for GI. Conclusions:The practice of boxing does not cause significant oral changes. Relevant changes were found only in TMJ palpation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Caciones, A., Antunes, M., Assunção, V., Albuquerque, T., & Luís, H. (2018). Estudo preliminar da saúde oral de desportistas praticantes de boxe. Revista Portuguesa de Estomatologia, Medicina Dentaria e Cirurgia Maxilofacial, 59(4), 215–220. https://doi.org/10.24873/j.rpemd.2018.11.419

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free