Till time (and poor planning) do us part: Programs as dynamic systems—Incorporating planning of sustainability into theories of change

10Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article describes the need for, and challenge of, representing the sustainability of a program as a dynamic process. Part of what enhances the complexity of programs is the challenge of dynamic complexity—the complexity of the program evolves over time through the interaction of actors and their environment. The problem is not just one of representation but also of planning—specifically planning for sustainability. We argue that an essential part of any accountability regime is planning for sustainability. Using the concept of programs as dynamic process, we argue that planning for sustainability needs to be a critical aspect of the impact chains of all theories of change. Both the representation and testing aspects of such a formulation are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sridharan, S., & Nakaima, A. (2019). Till time (and poor planning) do us part: Programs as dynamic systems—Incorporating planning of sustainability into theories of change. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 33(3), 375–394. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.53055

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free