Comparison of feature point detectors for multimodal image registration in plant phenotyping

3Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

With the introduction of multi-camera systems in modern plant phenotyping new opportunities for combined multimodal image analysis emerge. Visible light (VIS), fluorescence (FLU) and near-infrared images enable scientists to study different plant traits based on optical appearance, biochemical composition and nutrition status. A straightforward analysis of high-throughput image data is hampered by a number of natural and technical factors including large variability of plant appearance, inhomogeneous illumination, shadows and reflections in the background regions. Consequently, automated segmentation of plant images represents a big challenge and often requires an extensive human-machine interaction. Combined analysis of different image modalities may enable automatisation of plant segmentation in “difficult” image modalities such as VIS images by utilising the results of segmentation of image modalities that exhibit higher contrast between plant and background, i.e. FLU images. For efficient segmentation and detection of diverse plant structures (i.e. leaf tips, flowers), image registration techniques based on feature point (FP) matching are of particular interest. However, finding reliable feature points and point pairs for differently structured plant species in multimodal images can be challenging. To address this task in a general manner, different feature point detectors should be considered. Here, a comparison of seven different feature point detectors for automated registration of VIS and FLU plant images is performed. Our experimental results show that straightforward image registration using FP detectors is prone to errors due to too large structural difference between FLU and VIS modalities. We show that structural image enhancement such as background filtering and edge image transformation significantly improves performance of FP algorithms. To overcome the limitations of single FP detectors, combination of different FP methods is suggested. We demonstrate application of our enhanced FP approach for automated registration of a large amount of FLU/VIS images of developing plant species acquired from high-throughput phenotyping experiments.

References Powered by Scopus

Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints

50031Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF)

12722Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Image registration methods: A survey

5881Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

An overview of image registration for aligning mass spectrometry imaging with clinically relevant imaging modalities

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Registration and fusion of close-range multimodal wheat images in field conditions

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Automated image registration of RGB, hyperspectral and chlorophyll fluorescence imaging data

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Henke, M., Junker, A., Neumann, K., Altmann, T., & Gladilin, E. (2019). Comparison of feature point detectors for multimodal image registration in plant phenotyping. PLoS ONE, 14(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221203

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

62%

Researcher 3

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

33%

Computer Science 2

22%

Engineering 2

22%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

22%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free