Antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis does not enhance immune responses to HIV in exposed but uninfected persons

15Citations
Citations of this article
119Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. Antiretroviral preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP), using daily oral combination tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine, is an effective human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention strategy for populations at high risk of HIV acquisition. Although the primary mode of action for the protective effect of PrEP is probably direct antiviral activity, nonhuman primate studies suggest that PrEP may also allow for development of HIV-specific immune responses, hypothesized to result from aborted HIV infections providing a source of immunologic priming. We sought to evaluate whether PrEP affects the development of HIV-specific immune response in humans. Methods and Results. Within a PrEP clinical trial among high-risk heterosexual African men and women, we detected HIV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ peripheral blood T-cell responses in 10%-20% of 247 subjects evaluated. The response rate and magnitude of T-cell responses did not vary significantly between those assigned PrEP versus placebo, and no significant difference between those assigned PrEP and placebo was observed in measures of innate immune function. Conclusions. We found no evidence to support the hypothesis that PrEP alters either the frequency or magnitude of HIV-specific immune responses in HIV-1-exposed seronegative individuals. These results suggest that PrEP is unlikely to serve as an immunologic prime to aid protection by a putative HIV vaccine.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pattacini, L., Murnane, P. M., Baeten, J. M., Fluharty, T. R., Thomas, K. K., Bukusi, E., … Mugo, N. R. (2015). Antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis does not enhance immune responses to HIV in exposed but uninfected persons. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 211(12), 1943–1952. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiu815

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 49

68%

Researcher 17

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

1%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 37

56%

Nursing and Health Professions 13

20%

Immunology and Microbiology 10

15%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free