Evaluation of 32Si as a tracer for measuring silica production rates in marine waters

85Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The radioisotope 32Si was evaluated as a tracer for measuring silica production rates in marine waters. 32Si is a weak β-emitter that decays to 32P allowing the isotope to be used to determine simultaneously the production rate of biogenic silica and organic phosphorus. High specific activity 32Si, 42,000-52,000 Bq (μg Si)-1, was produced by the proton spallation of KCl. Reasonable tracer additions result in only nanomolar increases in the ambient silicic acid and orthophosphate concentrations during production rate experiments. Protocols for quantifying the amount of 32Si and 32P in samples by liquid scintillation counting (LSC) and gas-flow proportional counting (GFPC) are presented. Both protocols eliminate the 4-month wait for secular equilibrium between 32Si and 32P required by earlier methods. GFPC is especially useful as the instrumentation is lightweight and portable allowing real-time analysis of samples at sea. Real-time analysis by GFPC at sea and postcruise analysis by LSC gave results that agreed to within 17 and 7% for 32Si and 32P, respectively. Subsequent intercalibrations of the LSC and GFPC methods indicated that agreement to within 0.1-4% for both isotopes can be achieved. Parallel incubations of samples from Monterey Bay, California, using the radioisotope 32Si and the stable isotope 32Si gave silica production rates that generally agreed to within 30%. No significant bias was observed between rates obtained with the two tracers. The greater sensitivity and ease of analysis of the radioisotope makes 32Si the tracer of choice for future studies of silica production in the ocean.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brzezinski, M. A., & Phillips, D. R. (1997). Evaluation of 32Si as a tracer for measuring silica production rates in marine waters. Limnology and Oceanography, 42(5 I), 856–865. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1997.42.5.0856

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free